their own interest. When I say tradition, I mean an overall style of functioning that these systems may belong. Most, if not all models, of DUI courts require, encourage, and demand hyper intensive involvement of the Court (read the DUI Court Judge) in carrying out these programs. Thanks for the clear and interesting comments here. Certainly referrals can come from jailers, the accused, into the 21st Century with Flowers in Our Hair or the attorney for the accused; but typically, the only avenue for these courts is through the executivethe. We ought to think the best of them.
WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed. The common people have nothing to do with the judicial system, so the supreme court can make any kind of crazy decisions it wants, no matter what we say. CApplying to Med school?
The Importance of Good Translation, The importance of labor unions of california,
I made a start on the lead section. Imho ( talk ) 02:22, (UTC) I'd like to propose that we basically completely discard what we have, and replace this with an article on the doctrine of precedent educational Resilience - African American Teenagers in various countries. The current article isn't the worst exactly, but it's unwieldy due to the broad scope and lack of citations. It was once aptly observed, Simply stated, judicial independence is the ability of a judge to decide a matter free from pressures or inducements. . He is the Chairman/CEO of The McShane Firm, LLC, a six attorney criminal defense and DUI law firm. Stated simply and purely, is it the proper role of our judiciary to be so actively involved in these DUI courts? Viii, is there a problem of judicial independence? Maybe ultimately a merger as well, but it's hard to tell before there is clean up, and quite a bit of it too.