their ideas, its likely because their ideas carry little weight. Websites that end.com and.org are sometimes credible, but sometimes not. If the author is affiliated with a reputable institution or organization, what are its values and goals? CPI Network 20, aD Network, camiedians, cambodia, ad Expert., Ltd. So far, we have discussed many types of sources that are unacceptable for scholarly writing: many websites, non scholarly books, etc. It just indicates that the source may not be reliable.
#290D, Mao Tse Tung Blvd, Sangkat Tubnubteuk, Khan Chamkarmorn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Are those three elements appropriate for your project?2 Using a source that is too specialized and technical for your needs may lead you to misinterpret the information given, which is just as hurtful to your own credibility as using an unreliable source. Academics have a long memory; too many transgressions into the land of unreliable sources, and youll be a marked writer with a marred reputation. Our friendly and resourceful Camiedians have landed all around Asia and in the United States. This is a book that discusses the evolution of the criminal justice system. Thats true you should never cite Wikipedia for multiple reasons: its written anonymously, so you cant know the credibility of the author, and its continually updated, so its not a stable source. Textbooks are wonderful teaching aids; they condense technical information into easily understandable language for students who are learning that material for the first time. Abstract, criminal justice refers to the system of institutions and practices that governments direct towards maintaining and supporting a collective social control, mitigating and deterring crime, or imposing stiffer penalties on those who break the laws with imposition of penalties and efforts to rehabilitate. However, if you find information that you find useful, that information may be cited in a more reputable footnote.