best-known and most influential essay. Got a writing question? This integration of specialties across the board greatly strengthened and influenced Thomas's writing. Moreover, in his responses to overreliance on technology and wealth as cures for the human condition, one sees hints of the ideas of Martin Heidegger and other existentialists. The essay displays both his scientific interest and his Transcendentalist vision of the meanings to be found in human encounters with nature. Toward the end of his life Thoreaus naturalistic interests took a more scientific turn; he pursued a close examination of local fauna and kept detailed records of his observations.
A Comparison of Emerson and Thoreau
According to Woodlief, Thomas's articles mixed "both scientific and natural facts, generally of the human body rather than wilderness or landscape, with personal meditation and a vision of the integral connectedness of man and the universe." a Different Side of Gang Authority Before this, Thomas had been writing his own poems. We must learn how to get along. In Life without Principle Thoreau considers the Gold Rush and remarks that a grain of gold will gild a great surface, but not so much as a grain of wisdom. His essays, books, and poems weave together two central themes over the course of his intellectual career: nature and the conduct of life. The layers of gases around the Earth trap sunlight and store it, providing light, heat, and energy for our globe. Wherever in the world individuals and groups embrace human rights over political rights, they invoke the name of Henry David Thoreau and the words of his essay. It is not simply a fixture of our minds to make mistakes, but it is a fixture in all living beings, in all cells (once again creating the metaphor between the universe and the tiniest pieces of our world). He is an aspiring socialite and lives his life to impress others. Should he live simply or under the rule of material wealth? Though he does not openly propose violent action, he seems more amenable to it than he had in Civil Disobedience. We think our way along by choosing between right and wrong alternatives, and the wrong choices have to be made as frequently as the right ones.